Factor
Woodstock, VA
Male, 65
My life in ATC began with 4 years Air Force then another 30 years with the Federal Aviation Admin. working tower & radar at some big international airports. I fought in the 1981 war with PATCO, survived the strike and kept a job that was just too exhilarating to walk away from. While there was nothing better than working airplanes, I did move on through several air traffic supervisory and management positions. It was a long, crazy career but I wouldn't trade a moment of it for love or lucre!
This is an important question. I’ll attempt to answer it with callous objectivity - tainted by a sprinkling of subjective sentiments and a smidgen of erratic rationale. Always the controller.
The Country actually needs more controllers at the busiest FAA facilities and fewer to none at the less active locations. I would suggest a redistribution of resources except for the fact that controllers from the closing towers are not FAA employees. They work for private air traffic control services under contract to the FAA; the same FAA who pays them around a half million of our tax dollars per year, per tower. The airports these contract controllers work at did not meet the threshold in air traffic volume to justify an FAA tower. While I hate to see anyone lose their job; I’d say that closing these towers is “a healthy trimming of fat.” They are a legacy of better times.
The “scary reduction in safety” card is being played mainly for political purposes. One Congressman stated; “Closing control towers is equivalent to removing stop lights and stop signs from our roads...” This is not only a bad analogy but isn’t even amusing hyperbole. Closing those towers will be more like adding a few small speed bumps to air traffic operations. While some operations at these airports may be slowed down a bit; safety won’t be compromised. I’ll note here that all pilots are trained in how to conduct flight operations at uncontrolled (no tower) airports. Controllers are too. I worked at two busy radar facilities that had control jurisdiction over dozens of towerless airfields. Operations were conducted efficiently and with no derogation of safety.
Closures are slated to occur at low density airports with less than 150,000 takeoffs and landings per year. Doing the math; that amounts to a little over 400 aircraft movements in a 16 hour day (assuming no midnight shift) or about 25 takeoffs and landings per hour. In comparison, Atlanta Hartsfield Airport averages around 2,500 operations a day. If airport operators, users and other interested parties feel strongly enough about keeping their particular tower open, I suspect they could approach their State and/or local government about funding it.
Cheers,
Factor
Share Answer: 
That’s a tough one. There were several of each over the years. I remember seeing a large airliner make a hard landing during a severe thunderstorm. It went off the runway and broke in half in the grass. It was raining heavily when I saw the passengers come scurrying out of the wreckage. Fortunately, there was no fire and not a single fatality! I also recall watching a small, twin engine commuter aircraft take off. A couple hundred feet off the ground, the nose pitched up, the plane tilted sideways and fell. It made a large, smoking hole in the grass and no one survived. "I'll have these moments to remember."
Every November I recall a particular accident involving a small, privately owned, airplane. The pilot had flown into an airport we had control jurisdiction over. Another fellow and I were working the radar sector when he later took off with his young son. It was the Wednesday evening before Thanksgiving and they were headed home for the holiday. All was normal as the plane climbed to four thousand feet. It was then that we lost radio and radar contact with the flight. Local authorities quickly found the main wreckage site. One wing was missing and later located a mile or so away. No survivors. That one really bothered me.
The near misses I’ve seen weren’t as memorable – except for one. I was supervising the radar operation when one of my controllers issued a turn to one of the airliners he was working. To make a long story short, the pilot turned the wrong way. The turn took him directly into the path of another airliner flying at the same altitude. Both flights were operating in the clouds and couldn’t see each other. The two radar targets merged into one and my heart nearly stopped. In my head, I could see the two aircraft colliding, the fireball, the falling wreckage and the next day’s headlines. It was the most horrifying moment of my life. Just seconds later, when the radar antenna scanned that area again, I saw the two targets moving away from each other. I nearly fell over.
And they wonder why controllers drink.
Thanks for the question!
Factor
Share Answer: 
Thanks for your question and I really appreciate the compliment!
Although I cannot tell you what the gender ratio is these days; I can tell you there were no women in the Air Force towers I worked at during the Vietnam era. There were two female controllers and about 80 male controllers at the first FAA facility I worked in. The number of women gradually increased but not dramatically. By the time I transferred out (about nine years later), there were six to eight women onboard. One was fired during the 1981 strike. Damned shame too. She was an awesome controller.
The strike actually brought a significant influx of women into our workforce. When I arrived at my next facility in 1983, about 10% of controllers were women. That number grew significantly through the years and when I left there in the mid-nineties, both the Facility Manager and Assistant Manager were women.
I’m sure that, even today, the majority of controllers are male. I can only guess that’s because more women are not applying for the job. It is a tough, intimidating, male dominated and testosterone fueled profession but I can say the female controllers I worked with were among the best.
On my blog (the link is on my profile above)You can read about two of the women I worked with. Look for an entry I made on 01/12/12 titled "On Politics, Passing Acquaintances And Change." Skip down about eight paragraphs if you like and look for the part where I talk about Bonnie and Clare.
Thanks again!
Factor
Share Answer: 
Thanks for your questions. They’re good ones and they bring back a few memories!
In my world, which was a terminal facility where controllers were required to work in both the tower and radar room (a configuration that the FAA is moving away from), there was one Supervisor in the tower cab. Down in the radar room there was at least one Supervisor walking the floor and sometimes two if the demand required it. The day and evening shifts also had a second line Supervisor known as an Area Manager who manned the desk and was responsible for the entire operation. Although job titles have changed, you’ll still find a first line supervisor in most towers, plus a number of them in the radar room. That number will vary depending on how many control positions there are in the room.
Controllers didn’t disagree with each other very often but when they did; the exchange could become pretty intense! Sometimes these differences would be worked out later on in the break room or somewhere else after the shift ended.
In the thick of battle, Supervisors would often ‘ask’ controllers to do certain things they felt would facilitate the movement of traffic. Being able to circulate among all the control positions, a good Supervisor was able to maintain an overall picture of what was going on and act on that knowledge. Individual controllers needed to focus on their own area of responsibility and didn’t have the broad perspective Supervisors had. We were free to disagree with a Supervisor’s direction but compliance was mandatory; unless we were willing to face a charge of insubordination. That didn’t happen very often.
At one time in the late 1970s, there was an Article in the Professional Air Traffic Controller Organization (PATCO) Contract with FAA that attempted to address professional disagreements between controllers and Supervisors. The Article absolved the controller of responsibility for any negative outcomes that might occur from following the Supervisor’s order. It worked like this. If a Supervisor ordered you to do something either you or the union believed was unsafe; you would inform him or her that you were invoking that Article. Then you’d comply with the order. I never actually saw anything go wrong in these situations. In those days of constant friction between PATCO and FAA, I think that Article was simply a way for controllers to poke Management in the eye. It made some some people feel better but had no tangible effect on things.
Thanks again,
Factor
Share Answer: 
Dry Cleaner
Why don't more dry cleaners stay open late?
Pharmacist
Why is an advanced degree required to dole out pills at a pharmacy?
Private Detective
Have you ever turned down a job because you thought it was too dangerous?
How much we got paid depended on who you asked. It’s probably the same story today. Some will say “Not nearly enough” and others will say “Too much!” I was always happy with my salary but never complained when I got a raise! Controller pay rates have changed through the years but their earning potential is still among the highest for Civil Service workers.
Salaries vary depending on where a controller works. Those who work at low traffic density airports don’t make nearly as much as those who work in very busy facilities like Atlanta, Dallas or Washington. Starting out at the GS-7 grade, the annual base pay is about $33,979.00. Controllers who end up in one the busiest facilities can work their way up to the GS-14 level; making as much as $110,104.00 in base pay. The highest supervisor grade (GS-15) can make $129.517.00. To those base salaries, add on extra money controllers make for working nights, Sundays, holidays and other premium pay situations that bump those annual totals higher. Keep in mind, I am referring to Federal ATC positions. There are a number of private ATC companies supplying controllers to facilities that don’t meet the criteria for FAA controllers.
To your second question – Yes, everyone in the control room is or once was a controller. First line management(supervisors) work directly with controllers and are required to stay proficient on the control positions. Falling into the “was” category would be the second line management folks who are responsible for the entire shift but are no longer required to control traffic. A desk job.
Thanks for asking!
Factor
Share Answer: 
You’ve asked an easy question B.T. but the answer makes me very uneasy! When people work within a system for years, decades and careers, they accept the technology in use and rarely consider its vulnerabilities. That’s good in a way because understanding just how fragile something is could be distracting or, at worst, make you brood over it. If you do a lot of flying; I hope my answer doesn’t have those effects on you.
The FAA does not encrypt voice communications between pilots and controllers. They both use “standard radio frequencies” in the very high frequency (VHF) range for most ATC functions. The frequencies used are widely published and available to anyone; as is the radio equipment required to transmit and receive on them. This lead to an unexpected situation in 1981, after the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) went on strike against the FAA. Things didn’t go well for the union and, as the strike dragged on, they grew increasingly determined to convince the public that non-striking controllers were dangerously incompetent. Plans were made and here’s what happened next.
Reports started coming in of ‘phantom controller’ radio transmissions to pilots during critical phases of flight. For example; an airliner about to land might be suddenly waved off or a plane might be cleared for takeoff just as another was about to land. Anything to create confusion. These incidents were perpetrated by striking controllers, using their own radios tuned to our control frequencies. They’d sit, somewhere near the airport where they could watch and listen. Then, at the right moment, they’d transmit bogus instructions. As former controllers, they knew exactly what to say and when to say it. Of course the pilots initially thought it was us! Fortunately, this didn’t go on for long after the FBI got involved.
Thanks for writing!
Factor
Share Answer: 
Hi Yoanda. Thanks for the nice compliment on my blog! I should also congratulate you for being the first person ever to ask that question. The phrase “No longer a factor” actually means a couple of things to me. I’ll begin with the more esoteric meaning; familiar mainly to controllers and pilots.
Let me set this up. Pilots can have a hard time seeing other airplanes, even under the best weather conditions. No surprise, given the speeds that modern airplanes operate at. Pilots might not see converging traffic until the two flights are very close together, and that may be too late. Think about two planes, each traveling at, say, 300 knots and moving toward each other. Their actual rate of closure is more like 600 knots. Assuming the pilots saw each other at some point, there would be very little time to react if they needed to avoid a collision. This is where a controller working a radar sector can help.
As you might guess, radar can spot airplanes long before a pilot can. ATC could be working both planes or just one of them but either way; if it looks like the two might pass in close proximity to each other, the controller will issue what we call a traffic advisory. That way, the pilot or pilots won’t be surprised when they see the other aircraft. In the congested airspace around busy airports, traffic advisories can be very important in helping pilots be aware of what’s going on around them.
Traffic advisories are always issued in reference to a twelve-hour clock. The aircraft’s nose is always at the twelve o’clock position. For example; if the controller saw a radar target on a converging course with your flight, eight miles ahead and to your left, he or she might advise you; “Traffic, ten o’clock, eight miles.” By cranking your head around from the 12 to the 10 o’clock position, there is a pretty good chance you’ll see the other airplane. If that traffic is under ATC control, the controller may add that the other flight is not at your altitude so you won’t worry so much. Once the other plane has passed the potential point of conflict; the controller will tell you; “Traffic no longer a factor!” In 500 words or less, that’s the ATC insider’s meaning of the phrase.
Using the phrase as my screen name is just my way of saying that, as both a controller and a pilot, I once was a “factor” in the aviation industry. As I am now blissfully retired from ATC, have not flown in years and my blog provides only tangential contact with the industry; I am officially “no longer a factor!”
But you can call me “Factor.” Thanks for writing!
Share Answer: 
-OR-
Login with Facebook (max 20 characters - letters, numbers, and underscores only. Note that your username is private, and you have the option to choose an alias when asking questions or hosting a Q&A.)
(A valid e-mail address is required. Your e-mail will not be shared with anyone.)
(min 5 characters)
By checking this box, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to Jobstr.com’s Terms and Privacy Policy.
-OR-
Register with Facebook(Don't worry: you'll be able to choose an alias when asking questions or hosting a Q&A.)
Browse Jobs
Host a Q&A
Search
Submit Your Question
Host a Q&A
Last 7
