West Hartford, CT

Female, 34

I am a wine educator, Certified Sommelier through the Court of Master Sommeliers, and founder of Vindulge, Wine Education & Consulting -- a wine consulting company focusing on enhancing the consumers wine experience through classes, seminars, private buying in addition to commercial consulting. I am also a freelance wine, food, and travel writer and frequent tasting panelist and judge for wine competitions. I also speak at conferences and events on various aspects of wine and food.

SubscribeGet emails when new questions are answered. Ask Me Anything!Show Bio +


Ask me anything!

Submit Your Question

16 Questions


Last Answer on April 30, 2013

Best Rated

What's your favorite bottle of wine for under $20?

Asked by labrat about 11 years ago

I have many! But if I had to choose one it would probably be Lucien Albrecht Cremant d'Alsace Brut Rosé, for many reasons. Sparkling wines are my favorite style of wine hands down, and this sparkling rosé is one of the most consistently well made in this price category. Plus it is widely distributed and can be easily found throughout the country. So when I am traveling and a wine store doesn’t have a wide variety of options, I can usually find this bottle. It may be on the high end of that price spectrum (can be found from $17-$21), but it’s worth every penny in my book.

Speaking of bubbly, Gruet (from New Mexico!) also produces some excellent sparkling wines retailing for an average of $15.

Is a sophisticated palette something you either "have or you don't", or can you train yourself to be more distinguishing and if so, how?

Asked by TundeB about 11 years ago

While there are people out there whom I believe have a gift for distinguishing aromas and flavors in wine, you can certainly train yourself to develop more of a “sophisticated” palate. Most professionals in the wine industry are as such because of training and constantly developing their palate.

It begins by simply paying attention to what you are doing. This is one of the reasons why professionals will spit at seminars and events. Besides the obvious effects of swallowing too much wine, spitting forces your brain to pay attention. So next time you are tasting a wine, try taking a taste of it, smell it, then take a small sip and swirl it. Close your eyes if it helps you focus. Then after a few seconds, spit the wine out. Take notice of what you smelled, tasted, and how it felt after leaving your mouth. Write this down and remember it. The more you taste like this the more you can train your palate to notice the nuances in any a wine.

Training your palate also involves tasting a lot of wine! So go to wine shops and wine events where you can sample different wines. Again, start paying attention and keeping notes in book. The more you pay attention, the better your palate will become.

I'm sure you've seen it, but there's that scene in "Sideways" where Paul Giamatti's wine connoisseur character nearly goes berserk at the thought of drinking Merlot. Is there any truth to that? Is Merlot considered bottom of the barrel, so to speak?

Asked by brikhaus about 11 years ago

Merlot is most definitely NOT the bottom of the barrel! In fact, the wine Miles was drinking at the end of the movie was a 1961 Château Cheval Blanc, a famous Bordeaux blend of Merlot and Cabernet Franc. The movie doesn’t reveal this but in the book the reason he didn’t like Merlot was because of his ex wife.

Merlot is one of the most important varietals in the world (in terms of plantings and consumption), and while there are some boring and bland versions, it can also make for an amazing wine!

How often do you send a bottle of wine back after you do the table-side mouth swirl thing? I feel dumb every time I do it because honestly, unless it was vinegar, I'm not even sure I'd know if anything was amiss.

Asked by pfriedland about 11 years ago

One of the primary reasons to test the wine at the table nowadays is to make sure the wine is not flawed. It is absolutely okay if you are not familiar on how to tell whether or not a wine is indeed flawed or not. If you are unsure you can always ask the sommelier or your server if you suspect something may be off with the wine and they can test it. You don’t want to send the wine back if you simply don’t like the taste of the wine (though that is acceptable at some establishments). If you test the wine, and it seems pleasant and you are happy drinking it, then that’s all that really matters. If there’s a problem with it, send it back or ask your server.

I know so little about wine, but am frequently invited to dinner parties and obviously don't wanna show up empty handed. What's one white and one red (reasonably priced) where I can never go wrong?

Asked by jason k. about 11 years ago

I like to suggest bringing a bottle of sparkling wine to the host (as either a host gift or to be opened at the dinner). It is festive and nice gesture of appreciation and celebration and the perfect drink to begin any dinner party. The sparkling wines mentioned in the question above (like the Lucien Albrecht Cremant d'Alsace Brut Rosé) would be good starting points.

For a red, Seghesio Sonoma County Zinfandel is a great crowd-pleasing wine that can be found from $20-25. If that is above your ideal price point there are several Malbecs from Argentina that are also great for crowds/dinner parties as well. Tomero and Gouguenheim make very nice Malbecs that retail for around $10-12. These are good options especially if you don’t know what style of wine your host prefers. They are versatile and crowd friendly.

What criteria do judges use at wine competitions and is there typically a consensus as to the winner? I always thought that wine appreciation was subjective, so the idea of a competition with a "winner" seems almost foreign to me.

Asked by gopherball about 11 years ago

For general consumers wine is incredibly subjective (and should remain that way). In a competition setting judges generally look to see whether a wine is a good representation of the varietal. Each style of wine has its typical characteristics, and judges look for a) is it a good representation of those characteristics, and b) does it exceed those typical expectations and stand out amongst its peers. In my experiences, if it is a well-made wine representative of those characteristics then it is worthy of a bronze, and often silver medal. The ones that stand out positively and leave lasting impressions will receive gold or higher medals. The point is to honor well-made wines, and bring recognition to achievement in winemaking. And no, there is not always a consensus among “winning” wines. Often hours will be spent determining which wine will come out on top.

Um...freelance wine, food, and travel writer? Sign me up. Seriously - how did that fall into your lap?

Asked by Juliana about 11 years ago

It didn’t necessarily “fall” into my lap ;)

I started writing on my blog as a hobby, as I was studying to take my sommelier exams years ago, and have kept it up regularly and eventually began submitting to publications outside my blog. It is something I’ve been working hard at for several years. It is something I love, have a deep passion for, and work long hours to maintain.